Elena Almost Built Something Nobody Wanted. (X of 2 in a series)

Contents

I need to tell you something uncomfortable.

The number one reason new businesses fail isn’t bad ideas. It isn’t lack of funding. It isn’t even lack of skill.

It’s this: they build something before finding out if anyone wants it.

I’ve watched it happen so many times it hurts. Smart, talented people spend weeks — sometimes months — perfecting a product, designing a website, building out a whole service offering. They pour their heart into it. Then they launch and hear… nothing. Crickets. Not because what they built was bad. Because they never stopped to ask a simple question first.

Will someone pay for this?

Not “do they think it’s cool.” Not “did my friends say it’s a great idea.” Will they actually open their wallet and hand you money?

Elena almost made this mistake. Let me show you what happened.

•  •  •

Elena was energized. The market scanner had confirmed what she felt in her gut — e-commerce fulfillment companies scaling past their startup systems needed exactly the kind of operational expertise she’d spent twenty-two years building. The AI had mapped out revenue potential, identified target customers, even suggested pricing ranges.

She was ready to build. Her brain was already designing the consulting packages. Three tiers. A workflow audit product. Maybe a templated system she could license. She opened a new document and started outlining.

Then she stopped.

Something her old boss used to say echoed in her head: “Elena, never build the warehouse before you’ve got the inventory orders.”

He was talking about physical space planning. But the principle was the same. She was about to build the entire business before confirming a single customer existed.

She went back to the AI.

“I need to know if this market is real before I build anything. Help me find out what these companies are actually struggling with — in their own words.”

•  •  •

Smart move. And the prompt Elena used next is one of the most valuable in this entire series. It’s a research tool that helps you understand not just WHAT your potential customers struggle with, but how they TALK about those struggles. That language becomes the foundation of everything you build and everything you say about it.

Prompt 3: The Pain Point Deep Dive

You are an expert customer research analyst who specializes in uncovering the real,

unfiltered problems and frustrations that drive purchasing decisions. You know how to

find and interpret what real people say about their struggles in online conversations.

I am considering building [describe your business idea and model — e.g., “a consulting

service that helps e-commerce fulfillment companies optimize their warehouse operations

as they scale past $2M in revenue”] for [describe your target customer in detail —

e.g., “founders and operations leads at DTC brands doing $2M-$10M who are drowning in

fulfillment errors, shipping delays, and inventory nightmares”].

Research the biggest pain points this audience is experiencing by analyzing the types

of conversations happening in:

• Reddit threads and comments in relevant subreddits

• X/Twitter discussions and complaint threads

• Amazon reviews of competing products or books in this space

• YouTube comments on tutorial and advice videos

• Facebook groups where this audience gathers

• Industry forums and Q&A sites

• Google “People Also Ask” and related search suggestions

Give me:

1. The top 15 pain points ranked by frequency and intensity. For each, describe the

   problem in the customer’s own language — not marketing speak.

2. The specific words and phrases these people use when describing their frustration.

3. What solutions they’ve already tried and why those solutions failed or fell short.

4. What their “dream outcome” looks like — if they could wave a magic wand, what

   would the ideal solution do for them?

5. Any surprising patterns or underserved segments within this audience that most

   competitors seem to be ignoring.

Ask me any questions you have.

•  •  •

The output stopped Elena cold.

She’d assumed the biggest pain point would be warehouse layout or inventory software. That’s what she knew best. That’s what she would have built her consulting practice around.

She would have been wrong.

The number one pain point, by a mile, was the transition from founder-managed operations to having an actual ops team. These companies didn’t just need better systems — they needed someone to help them build the ROLE of operations into their company for the first time. They were drowning not because they lacked tools but because they lacked structure.

The language was raw. “I’m the CEO and the warehouse manager and the customer service rep and I’m losing my mind.” “We hired an ops person but I have no idea what to tell them to do.” “Every time we grow, things break, and I’m the only one who can fix them.”

Elena read those words and felt a fire light in her chest. She didn’t just understand this problem. She’d BEEN the solution to this problem for twenty-two years. She’d built the operations function from scratch at her last company. She’d written the playbooks, designed the roles, trained the people.

But before she let that excitement run away with her, she needed to see who else was already serving these companies.

•  •  •

What Elena just experienced is something I call the “recalibration moment.” It’s when the data shows you that what your customers actually need is different from what you assumed they needed. This happens to almost everyone, and it’s the reason we validate BEFORE we build. If Elena had gone with her gut and built a warehouse optimization consulting practice, she’d have been solving problem number seven on the list. The actual money — and the actual impact — was in problem number one.

Next, she needed to understand the competitive landscape.

Prompt 4: The Competitor Landscape Mapper

You are an expert competitive intelligence analyst who specializes in helping new

market entrants identify strategic positioning opportunities. You understand how to

evaluate competitors across product quality, pricing, customer experience, marketing

effectiveness, and market positioning.

I am planning to enter [describe your market/niche] with [describe your business model].

Here are 3-5 competitors or similar businesses I’ve identified:

• Competitor 1: [Name and brief description, or website URL if available]

• Competitor 2: [Name and brief description, or website URL if available]

• Competitor 3: [Name and brief description, or website URL if available]

(Add up to 5)

If I have not identified competitors, research and identify 5 notable businesses

serving this market.

For each competitor, analyze:

1. What they offer — core products/services, pricing tiers, and delivery method

2. Their apparent target customer — who are they serving?

3. Their strengths — what are they doing well?

4. Their weaknesses — customer complaints, unmet needs, operational gaps?

5. Their marketing and positioning — what messaging and platforms do they use?

6. Customer sentiment — what are real customers saying?

Then, based on this analysis:

A. Identify 3-5 specific gaps in the market that I could fill.

B. Recommend my strongest positioning angle.

C. Identify any competitive threats I should be prepared for.

Ask me any questions you have.

•  •  •

The competitive analysis revealed exactly what Elena needed to see.

The big consulting firms served enterprise companies. Way above her target market’s budget. There were a handful of “e-commerce coaches” who taught marketing and growth strategies but knew nothing about operations. And there were software companies selling tools — inventory management, shipping platforms, warehouse management systems — but nobody was helping these mid-size companies figure out the HUMAN side of operations.

The gap was enormous. And it was precisely where Elena lived.

She wasn’t a software tool. She wasn’t a big-firm consultant charging $50,000 for a strategy deck. She was the person who could walk into a growing e-commerce company, look at the chaos, and say: “Here’s the operations structure you need. Here’s who to hire. Here’s how to train them. Here’s the playbook.”

Now came the hard part. The part every fiber of her being wanted to skip.

She had to test it. Not by building a website. Not by designing a logo. By talking to real people and asking them to pay her real money.

•  •  •

This is the moment where I get fired up. Because what Elena is about to do is the thing that separates entrepreneurs who build real businesses from people who just think about it.

She’s going to test her idea with actual humans. Not a survey. Not “would you be interested in…” Not a focus group of friends and family who love her. She’s going to design a minimum viable test that gets real market signal — real people making real commitments with real money.

Most people skip this step because it’s terrifying. You’re putting yourself out there. You might hear “no.” You might discover that the idea you’re excited about doesn’t land the way you thought.

Good. Better to hear “no” now than after you’ve spent three months building something nobody asked for.

Prompt 5: The Minimum Viable Test Designer

You are an expert lean startup strategist and business validation consultant who

specializes in helping entrepreneurs test business ideas with minimal investment

before committing to a full build. You understand pre-selling, MVP methodology,

concierge testing, and rapid market validation techniques.

I want to validate this business idea before I invest significant time and money:

• My business idea: [Describe your refined business idea from previous prompts]

• My target customer: [Describe your ideal customer profile from Prompt 3]

• The core problem I solve: [The #1 pain point from Prompt 3]

• My competitive angle: [My key differentiator from Prompt 4]

• My budget for testing: [How much money you can invest — $0 is valid]

• My time available for testing: [Hours per week for the next 2-4 weeks]

Design a minimum viable test that:

1. Can be executed in 2-4 weeks with my available time and budget

2. Gets real market signal — not just people saying it’s a good idea but actual

   evidence of willingness to pay (pre-orders, deposits, paid pilots)

3. Includes specific outreach templates — exactly what to say when reaching out

4. Defines clear success and failure criteria

5. Requires the minimum possible version of my offer

6. Includes a day-by-day or week-by-week action plan

Be realistic. No motivational fluff — I need a practical test plan.

Ask me any questions you have.

•  •  •

The AI designed Elena’s validation test in four parts.

Week one: Identify 30 e-commerce companies in her target range through LinkedIn, industry groups, and her existing network. Reach out to 15 of them with a specific message: “I spent 22 years building operations for a logistics company. I’m exploring whether companies like yours need help structuring their ops team as you scale. Would you be open to a 20-minute conversation about what’s working and what’s not? No pitch, just research.”

Week two: Conduct the conversations. Listen. Take notes. At the end of each call, if the conversation revealed real pain, say: “Based on what you’ve described, I’m putting together a 90-day operations structuring program for companies at your stage. If I could help you build the operations function you just described needing, with a custom playbook and weekly implementation calls, would that be something worth exploring? I’m offering the first three spots at a founding rate of $3,000.”

Week three: Follow up. Collect commitments. Track responses.

Success criteria: 3 or more paid commitments out of 15 conversations.

Failure criteria: Fewer than 5 people willing to take the initial call, or zero paid commitments after all conversations.

Elena’s hands were sweating. This was real. This wasn’t hypothetical business planning in an AI chatbot anymore. This was picking up the phone. This was asking strangers for money.

She sent the first message on a Tuesday morning.

By Friday, she had eight calls booked.

By the end of week three, she had four paid commitments at $3,000 each. Twelve thousand dollars in revenue. For a business that didn’t have a website, a logo, or a business card.

Elena had a business.

•  •  •

Four commitments out of fifteen conversations. Twelve thousand dollars before she built a single deliverable.

Read that again.

Elena didn’t need a perfect website. She didn’t need a polished brand. She didn’t need a course on “how to start a consulting business.” She needed to know what she was good at, confirm the market wanted it, and then ask real people to pay for it.

That’s the validation phase. And it just turned Elena from someone who was “thinking about starting a business” into someone who HAS a business.

In the next post, Elena has to actually deliver. She needs a blueprint, a pricing model that scales, and a plan for what this business looks like beyond the first four clients. That’s where we go next.

➤ Using these prompts? Share what you’re building.

Join 500,000+ entrepreneurs in our free Facebook group: AI Prompts for Entrepreneurs

Post your results from Prompts 1-5. Tag me. Let’s see what your Skills-to-Business Translator uncovered. I read every post.

About the Author